Brian Leiter skewers Chronical reporter Carlin Romano (yet again) for a piece that calls Heidegger a “provincial Nazi hack.”
Seth Bait
"I’ve never before heard my work discussed like that, and rarely as intelligently ... I listened to the whole podcast, and felt exalted afterward." -- Arthur Danto
The Partially Examined Life is a philosophy podcast by some guys who were at one point set on doing philosophy for a living but then thought better of it. Each episode, we pick a text and chat about it with some balance between insight and flippancy. You don't have to know any philosophy, or even to have read the text we're talking about to (mostly) follow and (hopefully) enjoy the discussion. Discuss episodes and provide feedback here or via our Facebook group. You can also e-mail comments to mark@marklint.com or wesalwan@gmail.com.
Subscribe, rate, and read reviews on iTunes. 
Five Stars after 100+ iTunes Ratings.
"Intelligent and funny -- a rare combo. The best philosophy podcast on iTunes. In fact, one of the best podcasts on iTunes." More Reviews.
If you buy anything from Amazon, get there through a PEL link to donate 6% of your purchase to us.
#1 by Seth Paskin on December 19, 2009 - 5:54 pm
Hooked. I appreciate that Leiter takes the time to care about this kind of stuff but disagree with his tossaway line towards the end of the essay that Heidegger is derivative.
Not sure that even has meaning, but Heidegger was well read and lived in texts, so his thought follows closely with the work of others. That being said, it looked like Leiter was saying he was just rehashing ideas others had, which I would have to see demonstrated.
Heidegger’s thought defines a method as much as a set of ideas and I would challenge anyone to prove he isn’t providing something unique or valuable. At the very least, his influence on the next generation of thinkers and the fact that in 2009 people still feel motivated to call him a ‘provincial Nazi hack’ should say something for his contribution.