About the Podcast

What exactly is this podcast about?

Philosophy, philosophers and philosophical texts. The format is an informal roundtable discussion, with each episode loosely focused on a short reading that introduces at least one “big” philosophical question, concern or idea.

What are you guys trying to do here?

This podcast is our attempt to recreate the good old days when we’d meet up after a seminar to drink beer and talk shop or get some teaching yas out where students couldn’t talk back. We’re recording it to share the our joy in “doing” philosophy with all who care to listen while ranting bitterly about the profession that we so long ago escaped.

What makes you guys more qualified to talk about this stuff than all those University professors?

Absolutely nothing.

Who is this aimed at? Do I have to know anything about philosophy? Will I feel insulted by this if I already know a lot about philosophy?

Whoa, there Mr. or Ms. Insecure and/or Touchy, don’t worry yer little and/or enormous head about that. We aim to to assume no knowledge (of anything, even, like, basic facts of arithmetic or… like… hygiene), and we believe that even the most withered old Socrates-clone will find the proceedings very entertaining and thought-provoking, if not actually, well, informative.

Do we have to do the reading before listening to the individual episodes?

Well, if we don’t assume you know anything about philosophy, we certainly don’t assume you know anything about the text we are discussing (see how I did that…A includes B, so if you don’t know A, you don’t know B. ;) ). That being said, we believe that reading the texts before listening will make the podcasts more entertaining and informative. Also, they happen to be interesting, intellectually stimulating, fun and really important parts of the cultural history into which you were born (most of you anyway).

Should people listen to the podcast episodes in order, or does that matter?

Each episode is self-contained, but we invariably make some references to things said in previous episodes, so if you just want to hear about a few particular topics, sure, go listen to those episodes, but if you will likely eventually slog through them all, you’re best off starting with the first episode (which has lately for some reason disappeared from iTunes, so you’d have to download the two parts of it manually from this site).

OK, I’m intrigued, how do I get and listen to this digital stream of wisdom?

You can click on the “play” button underneath each episode on the main page, download the mp3 files directly to your computer and play them on your PC/Mac, transfer them to a portable music player, or if you have iTunes, click here and subscribe.

Um, I notice that on iTunes the podcast is labelled “Explicit”. I thought this was about Philosophy and great ideas…?

The podcast covers great ideas, thinkers and texts and while the subject matter is for mature and rational minds, it is not “adult.” It’s just difficult to talk passionately about philosophy (and for at least one of us, drink beer) and not drop an f-bomb once in a while. Hence the label: you are now officially warned.

How am I meant to listen to this podcast?

What? What kind of question is that? Oh, OK… as you may have noticed, the episodes are long… not long compared to a real-life late-night gab session among actual philosophers, and not long compared to the extended cut of the Lord of the Rings, but maybe longer than you may be used to in a podcast.

Well, first off, don’t just sit there at your PC listening to the whole thing, unless you’re at work and want to burn time, in which case, we’re your men. Go get an iPod or a Zune or something else that plays mp3 files, load the episodes on to it, and listen while driving cross country, while exercising or while on a stake-out. I personally like to listen while lying in bed, so that I then fall asleep somewhere in the middle and it gives me awfully strange dreams (like maybe dreaming that I’m in fact dreaming and not really perceiving this keyboard!). Better yet, listen to this instead of your loved ones.

Who did that art with the guy with his brain showing? It’s pretty cool.

Why, that was Ken Gerber, whose other work can be found at http://cartoonstand.wordpress.com/.

And the music?

Mark says: Since I do the final editing and posting of these audio files, I get to shunt in things from my back catalog that seem possibly slightly thematically appropriate. The instrumental intro to the podcast was actually repurposed from a clip I created (very quickly) as part of my job, from a video about how great transportation libraries are. I do have a band right now: http://www.newpeopleband.com, and you can hear much more music at http://www.marklint.com/samples.htm.

Does that mean you have to festoon the whole blog with your not-at-all-philosophical music posts?

Mark says: Yes. Well, no, but I don’t want to divide my marketing efforts between the philosophy and the music web content. I do try to say something of philosophical interest in the blog posts, anyway. Feel free to ignore them if you like.

In the course of the podcasts, we end up (per Socrates’s direction) analyzing what we think about things and why we do what we do, as individuals and collectively, and the point of the music posts is to do more of that, to force myself to think about and externalize why I feel the need to create in the way that I do and what, if anything, I’m trying to communicate through the work.

How do you guys do this and make it sound like you are sitting together when you live all over the US?

We do a Skype conference call and each one of us records our audio on our local computer. Seth and Wes use a freeware program called Audacity, while Mark uses SoundForge. After we are done, Wes and Seth send their files to Mark using sendspace.com and he combines them together (using Cubase), adds music, spends WAY too long removing some of the verbal ticks and pauses and particularly dumb comments, adds a bunch of metadata to make it look right in iTunes, and posts the finished file.

Is that expensive or something?

For hosting these blog pages and all of Mark’s music files, and for the first several months of hosting the podcast files, we used web space generously donated by Mark’s brother-in-law Brian Casey, who runs rootlevelservices.com. Also, while we’re thanking people, comedian/juggler/photographer/web designer Josh Casey set up this WordPress blog for us, and Dan Colman of the popular culture blog openculture.com helped us get the feed working and sending things to iTunes.

We now pay a modest fee for space on libsyn.com for our podcast episode space, and we’d happily accept donations to help with that:


You can also buy a T-Shirt or something.

I don’t have any more questions.

Go away, then.

But…can’t I just BE here…with you?

Oh, alright. Go check out the Facebook group or post comments on these here blog posts, and we’ll likely respond. Respond to comments by your fellow listeners! Start a community! Have PEL listening parties! Oh, and go on iTunes and give us a nice review, OK? Thanks.

  1. #1 by Dave Hamilton on July 16th, 2009

    I have subscribed and await with *bated* breath my first opportunity to listen.

    Speaking of which: Mark, does your family complain of the fishy smell that comes from your *baited* breath? Or are they used to it by now? :-)

  2. #2 by Mark Linsenmayer on July 16th, 2009

    All typos on these pages are carefully placed to separate the wheat from the chaff among our readership. You, sir, are prime, Grade-A, triple-monkey WHEAT.

  3. #3 by Ryan on September 7th, 2009

    “What this dufus is trying to mutter his way through…” lol. Very much enjoying you guys, hope schopenhauer is on the ticket.

  4. #4 by Tom Corwin on June 1st, 2010

    I’ve been enjoying your podcasts for a few weeks now. I listen while jogging mostly. I am particularly interested in the mind-body problem, and I wonder if you plan to discuss David Chalmer’s rather weird take on that topic. He seems to be a dualist. Cheers.

  5. #5 by Wes Alwan on June 2nd, 2010

    Hi Tom,

    Thanks very much — we will be recording a Philosophy of Mind episode soon (and posting sometime in July I think). I’m a big Chalmers fan and very much like his approach to the mind-body problem, so hopefully we can touch on that.

    Wes

  6. #6 by Mark Linsenmayer on June 2nd, 2010

    Thanks, Tom. Wes is a Chalmers fan, and I’m finding it intriguing, at least. The article we posted as a supplement was pretty difficult, so I don’t know that we’ll be getting much into it on this first mind podcast, though there will for sure be some general squabbling about dualism. Maybe Wes and I will follow up on the blog individually with some more detailed info re. what we’ve read from him, Nagel, Searle and Dennett.

(will not be published)

  1. No trackbacks yet.