About the Podcast

What exactly is this podcast about?

Philosophy, philosophers and philosophical texts. The format is an informal roundtable discussion, with each episode loosely focused on a short reading that introduces at least one “big” philosophical question, concern or idea.

What are you guys trying to do here?

This podcast is our attempt to recreate the good old days when we’d meet up after a seminar to drink beer and talk shop or get some teaching yas out where students couldn’t talk back. We’re recording it to share the our joy in “doing” philosophy with all who care to listen while ranting bitterly about the profession that we so long ago escaped.

What makes you guys more qualified to talk about this stuff than all those University professors?

Absolutely nothing.

Who is this aimed at? Do I have to know anything about philosophy? Will I feel insulted by this if I already know a lot about philosophy?

Whoa, there Mr. or Ms. Insecure and/or Touchy, don’t worry yer little and/or enormous head about that. We aim to to assume no knowledge (of anything, even, like, basic facts of arithmetic or… like… hygiene), and we believe that even the most withered old Socrates-clone will find the proceedings very entertaining and thought-provoking, if not actually, well, informative.

Do we have to do the reading before listening to the individual episodes?

Well, if we don’t assume you know anything about philosophy, we certainly don’t assume you know anything about the text we are discussing (see how I did that…A includes B, so if you don’t know A, you don’t know B. ;) ). That being said, we believe that reading the texts before listening will make the podcasts more entertaining and informative. Also, they happen to be interesting, intellectually stimulating, fun and really important parts of the cultural history into which you were born (most of you anyway).

Should people listen to the podcast episodes in order, or does that matter?

Each episode is self-contained, but we invariably make some references to things said in previous episodes, so if you just want to hear about a few particular topics, sure, go listen to those episodes, but if you will likely eventually slog through them all, you’re best off starting with the first episode.

Do you have an episode about [whatever]?

Take a look at the full list, or this other page that organizes them by topic. If we haven’t talked about it yet, you’re welcome to request a topic, say, in the comments thread on this very page.

OK, I’m intrigued, how do I get and listen to this digital stream of wisdom?

You can click on the “play” button underneath each episode on the main page, download the mp3 files directly to your computer and play them on your PC/Mac, transfer them to a portable music player, or if you have iTunes, click here and subscribe.

If you use an RSS reader, we have two feeds: one which contains all of our blog material including podcast episode announcements and postings, and one which has only the podcast episodes.

Um, I notice that on iTunes the podcast is labelled “Explicit”. I thought this was about Philosophy and great ideas…?

The podcast covers great ideas, thinkers and texts and while the subject matter is for mature and rational minds, it is not “adult.” It’s just difficult to talk passionately about philosophy (and for at least one of us, drink beer) and not drop an f-bomb once in a while. Hence the label: you are now officially warned.

How am I meant to listen to this podcast?

What? What kind of question is that? Oh, OK… as you may have noticed, the episodes are long… not long compared to a real-life late-night gab session among actual philosophers, and not long compared to the extended cut of The Lord of the Rings, but maybe longer than you may be used to in a podcast.

Well, first off, don’t just sit there at your PC listening to the whole thing, unless you’re at work and want to burn time, in which case, we’re your men. Go get an iPod or a Zune or something else that plays mp3 files, load the episodes on to it, and listen while driving cross country, while exercising or while on a stake-out. I personally like to listen while lying in bed, so that I then fall asleep somewhere in the middle and it gives me awfully strange dreams (like maybe dreaming that I’m in fact dreaming and not really perceiving this keyboard!). Better yet, listen to this instead of your loved ones.

What’s with this blog?

The blog is intended to provide supplemental information to the podcast and provide a forum for us podcasters (including our guest podcasters) to share interesting philosophy resources and things we’re thinking about that for whatever reason don’t make it on the show. On occasion, we also use it to show off our other projects (e.g. Mark’s music). It’s also a prime way for you to participate, by replying to these blog entries. You can initiate new discussions and share resources with our readers yourself through the Facebook group.

Who did that art with the guy with his brain showing? It’s pretty cool.

Why, that was Ken Gerber, whose other work can be found at http://cartoonstand.wordpress.com/.

And the music?

Mark says: Since I do the final editing and posting of these audio files, I get to shunt in things from my back catalog that seem possibly slightly thematically appropriate. The instrumental intro to the podcast was actually repurposed from a clip I created (very quickly) as part of my job, from a video about how great transportation libraries are. I do have a band right now with recent, very nice-sounding albums for sale that you can listen to here, and you can hear much more music here.

How do you guys do this and make it sound like you are sitting together when you live all over the US?

We do a Skype conference call and each one of us records our audio on our local computer, using either Audacity (freeware), Sound Forge, or (when using macs) Garageband. After we are done, Wes and Seth send their files to Mark using dropbox and he combines them together (using Cubase), adds music, spends WAY too long removing some of the verbal ticks and pauses and particularly dumb comments (Seth and Wes have been helping more with the editing lately, but Mark almost always does a final listen and removes additional material), adds a bunch of metadata to make it look right in mp3 players and posts the finished file.

Is that expensive or something?

Yes, we pay for hosting, some web development, recording stuff, books for the podcast, and spend a lot of time on this that it would be more financially advantageous to use on our jobs. So, we do happily accept listener donations:


You can also buy a T-Shirt or something. We also tend to get a (very) small amount of money when you click on one of our Google ads or when you follow one of our Amazon store links and buy something. Interestingly, we still get the commission from Amazon even if you buy something other than what we provided the link for, so I highly encourage you to support us by, whenever you’re going to buy something there, start on our page (like, say, an episode announcement link) and click through to do your shopping. In fact, we’ll give you a nice, giant ad to click on so you can come back here and find this easily:

Wow, that banner ad just stunned me. I’m not sure I like you any more, and I don’t have any more questions.

Fine. Go away, then.

But…can’t I just BE here…with you?

Fickle, aren’t you? Oh, alright. Go join the Facebook group or post comments on these here blog posts (you can see which postings have the most recent active discussions on the “Forum” tab here), and we’ll likely respond. Respond to comments by your fellow listeners! Follow us on Twitter and retweet our blog posts! Have our blog e-mails sent to you on a near-daily basis (you can enter your email address at the top right of this page) and forward them around! Start a community! Have PEL listening parties! Oh, and go on the iTunes store and give us a nice review, OK? Thanks.

Wait… Can I be on the show itself?

Well, maybe. If you’re particularly knowledgeable in some area of philosophy that you think we could use help with (e.g. non-Western), or are an academic or other professional in some field related to philosophy (e.g. science, art, being a big-name celebrity) with some background in philosophy, and if you have experience with graduate-level education and/or public speaking (teaching, podcasting, philosophy meet-up groups, lawyering), then drop us a line and give us some detail re. what topics you’d be interested in talking with us about. Failing that, I advise you to participate in the discussions on this blog and demonstrate to us how clear and insightful you can be, and what resources you’d bring to the table in participating on an episode.

Note, though, that we schedule these things pretty far out, and perpetually have a long list of topics that we’d like to cover, so if we end up leaving you in limbo for months and months, or don’t get around to including you at all, please don’t feel bad.

  1. #1 by Dave Hamilton on July 16, 2009 - 9:47 am

    I have subscribed and await with *bated* breath my first opportunity to listen.

    Speaking of which: Mark, does your family complain of the fishy smell that comes from your *baited* breath? Or are they used to it by now? :-)

    • #2 by Mark Linsenmayer on July 16, 2009 - 10:25 am

      All typos on these pages are carefully placed to separate the wheat from the chaff among our readership. You, sir, are prime, Grade-A, triple-monkey WHEAT.

  2. #3 by Ryan on September 7, 2009 - 11:25 pm

    “What this dufus is trying to mutter his way through…” lol. Very much enjoying you guys, hope schopenhauer is on the ticket.

  3. #4 by Tom Corwin on June 1, 2010 - 1:10 pm

    I’ve been enjoying your podcasts for a few weeks now. I listen while jogging mostly. I am particularly interested in the mind-body problem, and I wonder if you plan to discuss David Chalmer’s rather weird take on that topic. He seems to be a dualist. Cheers.

    • #5 by Wes Alwan on June 2, 2010 - 1:09 am

      Hi Tom,

      Thanks very much — we will be recording a Philosophy of Mind episode soon (and posting sometime in July I think). I’m a big Chalmers fan and very much like his approach to the mind-body problem, so hopefully we can touch on that.

      Wes

    • #6 by Mark Linsenmayer on June 2, 2010 - 9:47 am

      Thanks, Tom. Wes is a Chalmers fan, and I’m finding it intriguing, at least. The article we posted as a supplement was pretty difficult, so I don’t know that we’ll be getting much into it on this first mind podcast, though there will for sure be some general squabbling about dualism. Maybe Wes and I will follow up on the blog individually with some more detailed info re. what we’ve read from him, Nagel, Searle and Dennett.

  4. #7 by Ginger on November 18, 2010 - 8:10 pm

    I am so happy to have found you guys! Your podcasts have made my commute and lunch breaks super interesting! I love the style you guys have in discussing these matters. I am a subscriber! and look forward to the next ones!

  5. #8 by Austen on March 4, 2011 - 9:07 pm

    Awesome podcast!

  6. #11 by Kyle on April 9, 2011 - 5:03 pm

    Great content/podcast!! Spent many a hours listening while in the air, and on the AMTRAK lately.
    Particularly helpful listening to you guys whom are formally learned. Thus am able to get even more out of my good reading.
    For example–was surpised to discussion about epistemology with regards to Montaigne. I take away psychology and humanism from reading him mostly. Thus very interesting to hear what you guys take away from your readings.

    • #12 by Wes Alwan on April 11, 2011 - 12:27 pm

      Thanks Kyle!

  7. #13 by Amanda on July 20, 2011 - 1:49 pm

    I’m a philosophy double major and research assistant tasked with writing an article on Camus and you guys are amazing. The podcast on Camus is simply amazing. I might just listen to this for the next two semesters and assume brilliance.

  8. #15 by Dan on July 27, 2011 - 9:52 pm

    I just wanted to let you guys know how much your work is appreciated. For someone in grad school again now in philosophy (after a decade hiatus post M.A.), this podcast makes for great listening back and forth to campus and during otherwise mind-numbing work. It’s actually better that you three are not traditional, donnish academics – your perspective is fresh and honest rather than edited and revised and edited and revised and… anyway, makes for a great intro to some topics in philosophical history that I didn’t previously know much about.

    Especially since I am now preparing for a seminar on Wittgenstein, I especially enjoyed the TLP episodes. I have to say, after reading so much commentary (where the authors cannot afford to be so candid about how arrogant he was and how ridiculous some of the ideas are), it was refreshing to get a down to earth, but yet seasoned view on it. By my account, there is a selection process that goes into professional philosophy, ensuring the continuation of the same type of thinker (i.e., someone who can tolerate the currently accepted way in which academic writing is done)… the journal system discourages anything more than marginal originality. But that’s neither here nor there…

    Any chance you’ll get to the Neoplatonists, or maybe Vico, or perhaps some of the quirky moderns like Sartre?

    Anyway, great work – I look forward to hearing more!

    • #16 by Wes Alwan on August 21, 2011 - 11:42 pm

      Thanks Dan — much appreciated. Sartre’s coming soon, and I think Plotinus and Vico are somewhere on the list.

  9. #17 by Steve DeCresie on September 27, 2011 - 7:18 am

    I just found your site about a month ago … and I wanted to write a great review, but I am too busy listening to addictive philosophy podcasts to get anything else done.

    Thanx!

    • #18 by Seth Paskin on December 15, 2011 - 12:58 am

      Thanks Steve!

  10. #19 by Ben on December 14, 2011 - 9:51 pm

    I am looking forward to listening to you guys on the long drive from Boston to Cincinnati I will be undertaking this Christmas. I have just finished my first philosophy course in college and I am loving this podcast and how it feels like we are all sitting around and BS-ing about this stuff, and I am just the quiet one in the corner. Keep it up guys and it is very appreciated.

    • #20 by Seth Paskin on December 15, 2011 - 12:59 am

      Glad you are enjoying it – maybe soon you’ll be one of the BSers…:)

  11. #21 by St. Alexander on December 17, 2011 - 8:14 pm

    I am currently working on writing down my own personal philosophy & came across you folks through a search on Kierkegaard lectures (I’m neither a college student nor a very studious private citizen, so I always try to watch documentaries/lectures about the subjects I’m reading about).
    I just wanted to say that listening to you has left me with far more questions than it has answers & though that might sound insulting, I assure you it’s the highest compliment I could possibly issue forth.

  12. #23 by Johnathan Storlie on December 25, 2011 - 5:59 pm

    Hey, thanks for your podcasts. Listening to you all makes me feel a little less alone in the world.

    • #24 by Seth Paskin on December 25, 2011 - 8:12 pm

      Thanks for joining us Johnathan!

  13. #25 by adam on January 10, 2012 - 5:46 pm

    This is a great podcast. Listening to it has filled many a lonely hour on the highway. Some suggestions for future topics:

    - Listening to the Hegel episodes made me really curious what you guys would have to say about Fear and Trembling.

    - I wonder if you would do something like Unamuno’s The Tragic Sense of Life, or maybe Liberation Theology, or if these would be too religious.

    - Quentin Meillassoux’s After Finitude has been pretty fascinating so far.

    Thanks.

    • #26 by Wes Alwan on January 24, 2012 - 2:48 pm

      Thanks Adam! Will add your suggestions to the list.

(will not be published)