The Partially Examined Life
Posts Tagged faculty psychology
Episode 19: Kant: What Can We Know?
Posted by Mark Linsenmayer in Podcast Episodes on May 14, 2010
Podcast: Play in new window | Download (Duration: 2:05:31 — 115.0MB)
Reading Immanuel Kant’s Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics, which is sort of a post-publication Cliff’s Notes to his Critique of Pure Reason.
Do we have any business doing metaphysics, which is by definition about things that we could not possibly experience?
Kant says that yes, we can, to a limited extent, but that everyone before him did it wrong, because they didn’t understand how our minds interact with the world to create experience. He insists that once you read his book, you’ll never be satisfied with such “twaddle” again!
LEARN about the faculties of Sensibility, Understanding, and Reason! THINK about whether geometric truths are justified by our intuition of space (maybe) and arithmetic is grounded in our intuition of time (probably not). DOUBT whether we actually impose causality on our experience as Kant says! MARVEL at our guest participant, Azzurra Crispino, as she augments the number of speakers on this episode to a PERFECTLY SQUARE number! GAWK as your world is turned up-flicking-side down by Kant’s “Copernican Revolution” (a term we neither use nor explain in this episode)!
Read the book online or buy it.
End song: “Subjectivity” from the 1994 album “Happy Songs Will Bring You Down” by The MayTricks.
Azzurra Crispino, causality, David Hume, epistemology, faculty psychology, Immanuel Kant, metaphysics, philosophy of science, philosophy podcast, rationalism, space, time

"I’ve never before heard my work discussed like that, and rarely as intelligently ... I listened to the whole podcast, and felt exalted afterward." -- Arthur Danto
The Partially Examined Life is a philosophy podcast by some guys who were at one point set on doing philosophy for a living but then thought better of it. Each episode, we pick a text and chat about it with some balance between insight and flippancy. You don't have to know any philosophy, or even to have read the text we're talking about to (mostly) follow and (hopefully) enjoy the discussion. Discuss episodes and provide feedback here or via our Facebook group. You can also e-mail comments to mark@marklint.com or wesalwan@gmail.com.
Subscribe, rate, and read reviews on iTunes.
Five Stars after 100+ iTunes Ratings.
"Intelligent and funny -- a rare combo. The best philosophy podcast on iTunes. In fact, one of the best podcasts on iTunes." More Reviews. Sponsoring our Foucault episode:
If you buy anything from Amazon, get there through a PEL link to donate 6% of your purchase to us.We Examine
- 3 Quarks Daily
- Anne is a Man!
- Ask a Philosopher
- Big Questions Online
- Conversations from the Pale Blue Dot
- Dan Carlin's Hardcore History
- Elucidations
- Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy
- language goes on holiday
- Leiter Reports
- New APPS: Art, Politics, Philosophy, Science
- Open Culture
- Outside of Eden
- PATHWAYS
- Philosophy Bites
- Philosophy Forum
- Philosophy Forums
- Philosophy News
- Philosophy Now
- Philosophy Talk
- Philosophy TV
- Philosorapt[E]rs
- Reddit.com Philosophy
- Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
- Teach Philosophy 101
- The Browser: Philosophy and Religion
- The Philosopher's Zone
- Zuhanden.com
Archives
- February 2012 (8)
- January 2012 (23)
- December 2011 (23)
- November 2011 (28)
- October 2011 (19)
- September 2011 (23)
- August 2011 (13)
- July 2011 (26)
- June 2011 (29)
- May 2011 (25)
- April 2011 (22)
- March 2011 (24)
- February 2011 (25)
- January 2011 (26)
- December 2010 (39)
- November 2010 (31)
- October 2010 (34)
- September 2010 (34)
- August 2010 (25)
- July 2010 (15)
- June 2010 (17)
- May 2010 (18)
- April 2010 (10)
- March 2010 (18)
- February 2010 (9)
- January 2010 (8)
- December 2009 (7)
- November 2009 (2)
- October 2009 (4)
- September 2009 (2)
- August 2009 (1)
- July 2009 (5)
- June 2009 (4)
- May 2009 (3)




Recent Comments