Posts Tagged Karl Marx

Peter Singer on Hegel & Marx

In this series of videos of Bryan Magee interviewing a young Peter Singer, Singer provides an explication of Hegel’s overall philosophical enterprise.  We’ve linked to Magee’s show in other places (like here, here and here) and in this interview we get to see Peter Singer actually doing traditional philosopher-type stuff.  He has an outstanding ‘stach and nice square coke-bottle specs.

Watch on youtube.

The first episode focuses on history and the dialectical process.  They use the thesis-antithesis-synthesis characterization that is attributable to Fichte, not Hegel, but get the point across.  The second section brings up the idea of alienation and the question of whether Geist is a mental, spiritual or other concept.  The third installment covers Hegel’s concept of a rational society and Magee gives a good summary of Singer’s characterization up to that point.  Singer defends Hegel’s writing style here as well.  The fourth and fifth chunks cover Hegel’s influence and Marx.

I was a bit surprised that they don’t cover conscious and self-consciousness (where we spent our time in our episodes) or spend too much time on Reason; it’s clear Magee is interested in Hegel’s view of history and how it influenced Marx.  At the time the video was made, Marxism was still very present in the world in the ideology underpinning Communist societies.  I suppose we’ll end up looking at Hegel’s philosophy of right at some point in the future as well.

–seth

, , , ,

2 Comments

Debating Individual vs. Environmental Forces in History (or, Lord Bragg Loses his Bearing!)

Melvyn Bragg
Among my favorite podcasts is the BBC Radio 4 show In Our Time. IOT is usually a genteel forum dedicated to discussing “the history of ideas.” Topics and tone range from Oxbridge middlebrow to Oxbridge highbrow, but I always walk away learning something. I almost swerved the car, however, when tempers flared on last week’s episode. IOT’s host, Lord Melvyn Bragg, just about lost it when one of his guests declared “nationalistic” and “racist” his suggestion that British inventors played a non-trivial role in the Industrial Revolution. Who was more (in)correct is almost beside the point – academics yelling is great radio!

Read the rest of this entry »

, , , , ,

3 Comments