Posts Tagged Peter Singer
What to do about Behaving Badly
Posted by Dylan Casey in Misc. Philosophical Musings, Web Detritus on January 31, 2012
This is an obvious cross-reference for this group—indeed, many of you likely already read it. Peter Singer and Agata Sagan have an column in NYTimes’ “The Stone” today called “Are We Ready for a Morality Pill?” They present the conundrum of the how to factor in our growing understanding of the effect of brain chemistry not just on our mood and temperment, but also our inclination toward morally good actions. Essentially, there’s growing evidence that there are significant brain-chemical correlations not only for rather clear psychological pathologies like schizophrenia, major depression, and extreme anti-social behaviors, but also more subtle distinctions like our sensitivity for morally good behavior and our predisposition for altruistic or good-samartian-type acts. (We talk about some of this in our neurobiology episode with Pat Churchland.) Singer and Sagan conclude with:
Read the rest of this entry »
Peter Singer on Hegel & Marx
Posted by Seth Paskin in Things to Watch on April 12, 2011
In this series of videos of Bryan Magee interviewing a young Peter Singer, Singer provides an explication of Hegel’s overall philosophical enterprise. We’ve linked to Magee’s show in other places (like here, here and here) and in this interview we get to see Peter Singer actually doing traditional philosopher-type stuff. He has an outstanding ‘stach and nice square coke-bottle specs.
Watch on youtube.
The first episode focuses on history and the dialectical process. They use the thesis-antithesis-synthesis characterization that is attributable to Fichte, not Hegel, but get the point across. The second section brings up the idea of alienation and the question of whether Geist is a mental, spiritual or other concept. The third installment covers Hegel’s concept of a rational society and Magee gives a good summary of Singer’s characterization up to that point. Singer defends Hegel’s writing style here as well. The fourth and fifth chunks cover Hegel’s influence and Marx.
I was a bit surprised that they don’t cover conscious and self-consciousness (where we spent our time in our episodes) or spend too much time on Reason; it’s clear Magee is interested in Hegel’s view of history and how it influenced Marx. At the time the video was made, Marxism was still very present in the world in the ideology underpinning Communist societies. I suppose we’ll end up looking at Hegel’s philosophy of right at some point in the future as well.
–seth
Julian Baggini’s Philosophy Monthly – the PEL review
Posted by Seth Paskin in Other (i.e. Lesser) Podcasts on July 30, 2010
So Mark stole my thunder with his post about AC Grayling, as I was preparing my thoughts about Julian Baggini’s regular podcast, Baggini’s Philosophy Monthly. Nonetheless, even though Mark hates and wants to upstage me, I will proceed with my ramblings.
Julian Baggini
I found and started listening to Baggini’s podcast towards the end of last year and was able to reel off a series of cached episodes to get a feel for what he was about. Unlike Philosophy Bites, which consists of coordinated studio interviews, Baggini’s PM typically has more of a ‘Charles Kuralt‘ vibe (look up that reference – old skool!), as he travels around to festivals, conferences, and other assorted gatherings of the philosophically inclined, doing field interviews of philosophers, artists, and others surrounded by the din of beer halls, barking dogs, frolicking children, and the like. Not always, but a lot.
The episodes are a very short: 1/2 hour, usually consisting of 2-3 segments, which Baggini sets up well with edited-in commentary. Read the rest of this entry »
Episode 9: Utilitarian Ethics: What Should We Do?
Posted by Mark Linsenmayer in Podcast Episodes on September 18, 2009
Podcast: Play in new window | Download (Duration: 1:59:04 — 109.1MB)
Discussing Jeremy Bentham’s An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation chapters 1-5, John Stuart Mill’s Utilitarianism, and modern utilitarian Peter Singer’s “Famine, Affluence, and Morality.”)
Going full tilt on the Greatest Happiness principle, with talk of gladiators, consensual cannibalism, and illegal downloads. How many Pleetons were in your last orgasm? Should animals count in the utilitarian calculus? What is Bentham’s skull up to nowadays? This extra long episode (patched together from two recording sessions, as Seth’s audio track got toasted for most of the first one) is disgustingly thorough and only occasionally internally redundant.
Read the Bentham online. Here’s the Mill online, or you could buy it.Here’s the Singer essay (Also, for some more information on Singer’s view of animal liberation, look here.)
End song: “So Whaddaya Think?” by Mark Lint and the Fake (2000). Listen to the whole album online.






Recent Comments